Category Archives: Kabbalah, Jewish Thought, Ramchal, Torah, Hashkafa

Clearing up Petach 60

The whole point of the next, rather esoteric Petach — the 60th — is to clear up an apparent contradiction in R’ Chaim Vitale’s explanation of the role of the primordial kings (who experienced the Shevira process) and their eventual Tikkun. At one point he said that the kings derived from Adam Kadmon’s “eyes” and that MaH derived from its “forehead” (Eitz Chaim, Sha’ar Drushei Nekudot Ch.1), and elsewhere he said that the kings derived from Adam Kadmon’s Malchut and that MaH was a product of the male emissions of Adam Kadmon’s “Yesod” (Eitz Chaim, Seder Atzilut Ch. 2; also see Petach 96 below).

(c) 2013 Rabbi Yaakov Feldman

Feel free to contact me at feldman@torah.org

———————————————————-

AT LONG LAST! Rabbi Feldman’s translation of Maimonides’ “Eight Chapters” is available here at a discount.

You can still purchase a copy of Rabbi Feldman’s translation of “The Gates of Repentance” here at a discount as well.

Rabbi Yaakov Feldman has also translated and commented upon “The Path of the Just” and “The Duties of the Heart” (Jason Aronson Publishers).

Rabbi Feldman also offers two free e-mail classes on www.torah.org entitled “Spiritual Excellence” and “Ramchal”.

The Tikkun Process (3)

At this point, though, those conjoined units didn’t have influence upon lower Partzufim. That only came about once the center-spoke of the balance-scale came into play as well, aside from the left and right spokes. It enabled them to combine and to influence the lower Partzufim.

Nonetheless, everything was governed by mutual agreement and cooperation as a consequence of the Tikkun, rather than by one Partzuf or Sephira alone shining as had been the case beforehand.

Because this new order epitomized order and agreement — as well as reciprocal relationships — rather than the autonomous and sovereign stance that held sway over the various parts before, the parts were now said to be bound to one another like a, “father”, i.e. Abbah, “mother” i.e., Imma, “son”, i.e., Zeir Anpin, and “daughter”, i.e., Nukveh, thus illustrating those sorts of familial, vertical and horizontal reciprocal relationships.

As such, the great innovation of the Tikkun process was the instigation of the Partzuf system [1], thanks to which there are fuller, more mature phenomenon than isolated Sephirot interplaying in the universe. In fact, one almost has the impression of the earlier layout as an example of the interaction of kids walking down a hall single file, full of themselves, and self-important, who then mature into full-fledged family members who cooperate and interact healthily and selflessly.

Note:

[1] See Petach 70.

(c) 2013 Rabbi Yaakov Feldman

Feel free to contact me at feldman@torah.org

———————————————————-

AT LONG LAST! Rabbi Feldman’s translation of Maimonides’ “Eight Chapters” is available here at a discount.

You can still purchase a copy of Rabbi Feldman’s translation of “The Gates of Repentance” here at a discount as well.

Rabbi Yaakov Feldman has also translated and commented upon “The Path of the Just” and “The Duties of the Heart” (Jason Aronson Publishers).

Rabbi Feldman also offers two free e-mail classes on www.torah.org entitled “Spiritual Excellence” and “Ramchal”.

The Tikkun Process (2)

What first came about because of the aforementioned union was an immediate awakening of love between the lights (as well between all the other Sephirot that resulted from them). This refers to the onset of a strong attraction between “lovers”, or perhaps better said between “partners” that brings them together.

We’re not talking about human romantic love, attraction, or partnership of course. Perhaps the best analogy would be to the way one pole of a magnet is attracted to the opposite pole of another magnet: with a genuine and natural attraction and pull which is nonetheless non-emotional.

Thank to that “love”, Ramchal goes on  to say, the partners were no longer in the state of “sadness” or of being unfulfilled they had been in, in the course of the Shevira, when the lights stood in perpendicular relationship to each other. Instead, they faced one another, and they became bound to one another and assumed a horizontal relationship [1].

Note:

[1]       See Eitz Chaim, Sha’ar HaTikkun Ch. 3 where this is linked back to the primordial kings, the first seven of whom died as a consequence of the Shevira process, until the eight king (Hadar) arose — both he and his wife (see Genesis 36:39). Also see Iddrah Rabbah, Zohar 3, p. 135b.

(c) 2013 Rabbi Yaakov Feldman

Feel free to contact me at feldman@torah.org

———————————————————-

AT LONG LAST! Rabbi Feldman’s translation of Maimonides’ “Eight Chapters” is available here at a discount.

You can still purchase a copy of Rabbi Feldman’s translation of “The Gates of Repentance” here at a discount as well.

Rabbi Yaakov Feldman has also translated and commented upon “The Path of the Just” and “The Duties of the Heart” (Jason Aronson Publishers).

Rabbi Feldman also offers two free e-mail classes on www.torah.org entitled “Spiritual Excellence” and “Ramchal”.

The Tikkun Process (1)

What lies behind the Tikkun was the binding together of two emanations — that of Adam Kadmon’s “forehead” and “eyes”, which are MaH and BaN [1]. That’s to say that Tikkun is brought about when male (MaH) and female (BaN) join together.

In his comments here Ramchal refers to the “balance-scale” spoken of in the Zohar [2], which alludes to the great harmonizing that’s necessary for and is a product of Tikkun. He’ll illustrate that below, in Petach 69.

 

Notes:

[1]       See 7:4-5 above with our discussion of Petachim 32 and 34.

[2]       See beginning of Sifra d’Tzniusa.

(c) 2013 Rabbi Yaakov Feldman

Feel free to contact me at feldman@torah.org

———————————————————-

AT LONG LAST! Rabbi Feldman’s translation of Maimonides’ “Eight Chapters” is available here at a discount.

You can still purchase a copy of Rabbi Feldman’s translation of “The Gates of Repentance” here at a discount as well.

Rabbi Yaakov Feldman has also translated and commented upon “The Path of the Just” and “The Duties of the Heart” (Jason Aronson Publishers).

Rabbi Feldman also offers two free e-mail classes on www.torah.org entitled “Spiritual Excellence” and “Ramchal”.

Sources and Parallel Texts

Ramchal also discussed the ideas presented in Section Eleven in Sefer HaIlan 3:1-2, and Klallim Rishonim 18. Also see Otzrot Chaim, Sha’ar HaBerudim 1-2, Sha’ar Yaakov v’Leah 1, Sha’ar Zeir Anpin 1, and Eitz Chaim 29:2, 39:2.

(c) 2013 Rabbi Yaakov Feldman

Feel free to contact me at feldman@torah.org

———————————————————-

AT LONG LAST! Rabbi Feldman’s translation of Maimonides’ “Eight Chapters” is available here at a discount.

You can still purchase a copy of Rabbi Feldman’s translation of “The Gates of Repentance” here at a discount as well.

Rabbi Yaakov Feldman has also translated and commented upon “The Path of the Just” and “The Duties of the Heart” (Jason Aronson Publishers).

Rabbi Feldman also offers two free e-mail classes on www.torah.org entitled “Spiritual Excellence” and “Ramchal”.

Unity and Disunity

If the problematic Shevira process was a product of separation and differentiation, then its Tikkun — its remedy — must lie in combination and unity. We’ll be examining what went into that latter process in the course of this section

This is assumedly rooted in the idea that before they sinned (and “broke” the world’s very underpinnings) Adam and Eve were a single androgynous being [1], and thus need to be one again; and in the idea that there hadn’t been differentiation and incongruity until the “upper waters” and the “lower waters” separated from each other [2], so all that must be reunited. The point is that it will all be rectified in the end — when “God will be (manifestly) one, and His name (i.e., His manifestations) will be one (with Him)” (Zachariah 14:9).

Notes:

[1] Breishit Rabbah 8:1.

[2] Ibid. 4:2-4.

(c) 2013 Rabbi Yaakov Feldman

Feel free to contact me at feldman@torah.org

———————————————————-

AT LONG LAST! Rabbi Feldman’s translation of Maimonides’ “Eight Chapters” is available here at a discount.

You can still purchase a copy of Rabbi Feldman’s translation of “The Gates of Repentance” here at a discount as well.

Rabbi Yaakov Feldman has also translated and commented upon “The Path of the Just” and “The Duties of the Heart” (Jason Aronson Publishers).

Rabbi Feldman also offers two free e-mail classes on www.torah.org entitled “Spiritual Excellence” and “Ramchal”.

The Idea of Tikkun (3)

There are countless citations of Tikkun in the Zohar and (needless to say) in the Tikkunei Zohar, most of which clearly refer to as remedies for this or that, or to rectifications of sins, cleavages, or various acts of spiritual destruction. But the term was most especially fleshed out in Kabbalistic and Chassidic literature, where Tikkun refers to repairs made since the Shevira process (which is the subject here in Klach), and to either individual or universal full-actualization, and redemption. We’ll now see what Ramchal says about it here in this section.

(c) 2013 Rabbi Yaakov Feldman

Feel free to contact me at feldman@torah.org

———————————————————-

AT LONG LAST! Rabbi Feldman’s translation of Maimonides’ “Eight Chapters” is available here at a discount.

You can still purchase a copy of Rabbi Feldman’s translation of “The Gates of Repentance” here at a discount as well.

Rabbi Yaakov Feldman has also translated and commented upon “The Path of the Just” and “The Duties of the Heart” (Jason Aronson Publishers).

Rabbi Feldman also offers two free e-mail classes on www.torah.org entitled “Spiritual Excellence” and “Ramchal”.

The Idea of Tikkun (2)

The expression Tikkun Olam — universal betterment or repair — is used in the Mishna at several junctures (see Gittin 4:2 for example) in reference to a practice that should be followed because it helps avoid social disharmony rather than because it’s required by the Torah itself. The Gemorrah uses it in terms of a remedy for a lack or fault (see Chagiga 5A for example) or as a reparative regulation (see Baba Kama 82a for example). And mention is made of Tikkun Soferim (“scribal emendations”) at various points In Midrash Tanchuma, Midrash Rabbah, and in Rashi’s comments on the Torah. But the term was fleshed out considerably in Kabbalistic and Chassidic literature.

(c) 2013 Rabbi Yaakov Feldman

Feel free to contact me at feldman@torah.org

———————————————————-

AT LONG LAST! Rabbi Feldman’s translation of Maimonides’ “Eight Chapters” is available here at a discount.

You can still purchase a copy of Rabbi Feldman’s translation of “The Gates of Repentance” here at a discount as well.

Rabbi Yaakov Feldman has also translated and commented upon “The Path of the Just” and “The Duties of the Heart” (Jason Aronson Publishers).

Rabbi Feldman also offers two free e-mail classes on www.torah.org entitled “Spiritual Excellence” and “Ramchal”.

The Idea of Tikkun (Part 1)

The word Tikkun (תקון) itself is found only once in Tanach, where we’re told that “what is crooked cannot be made straight” or corrected (Eccl. 1:15). And that’s clearly the import of the act of Tikkun in Klach as well as in other Kabbalistic works.

Tikkun is used in Targum Onkelus quite interestingly in a couple of instances. The verse that reads “a woman must not wear men’s clothing, nor a man wear women’s clothing” (Deut. 22:5) is translated in Onkelus as “a woman must not wear men’s Tikkun, nor a man wear women’s Tikkun”, referring to a piece of clothing or in our context, as the thing that functions as the final adjustment of one’s appearance. Also see Onkelus to Exodus 33:4-6 where it’s used to refer to one’s jewelry or ornaments, which is the ultimate adjustment of one’s appearance.

 

(c) 2013 Rabbi Yaakov Feldman

Feel free to contact me at feldman@torah.org

———————————————————-

AT LONG LAST! Rabbi Feldman’s translation of Maimonides’ “Eight Chapters” is available here at a discount.

You can still purchase a copy of Rabbi Feldman’s translation of “The Gates of Repentance” here at a discount as well.

Rabbi Yaakov Feldman has also translated and commented upon “The Path of the Just” and “The Duties of the Heart” (Jason Aronson Publishers).

Rabbi Feldman also offers two free e-mail classes on www.torah.org entitled “Spiritual Excellence” and “Ramchal”.

Preview of Section Eleven (Part 2)

Our first concern of course is the makeup of the Tikkun process: what was involved, and what it brought about. So Ramchal starts off by saying that the Tikkun process consisted of the binding together of two emanations — that of Adam Kadmon’s “forehead” and “eyes”, which are MaH and BaN. We’ll explain those specifics, of course.

Once that came about, there came to be an immediate awakening of love between the lights, which were then no longer in the state of “sadness” they had been in, in the course of the Shevira, when the lights stood in perpendicular relationship to each other. Instead, each one turned to face the other, and they became bound to one another in the mystical sense of, i.e., like a, “father”, “mother”, “son” and “daughter”, where each light manifests kinship to the other in an appropriate manner (Petach 59). We’ll discuss the joy of love versus the sadness of opposition, and the idea of familial relationships among things.

We then concern ourselves with some of the more esoteric details, as in the fact that after the lights of Adam Kadmon’s “eyes”, which are BaN, emerged, they were tied to the governance of Malchut of Adam Kadmon, whereas when the radiation of the “forehead”, which is MaH, emerged, it was tied to the governance of Yesod of Adam Kadmon. Yesod and Malchut of Adam Kadmon then conjoined, and as a consequence all judgments were mitigated, and governance functioned along the lines of Tikkun and love instead (Petach 60).

The esoteric factors continue with the fact that MaH, which is to say, the lights of the “forehead”, which represent eventual perfection, had all the levels that were selected from BaN, which came about as a result of the Shevira process and represents imperfection, connected to it, and out of it were produced the “Tree of Holiness”, which is to say, the various of Partzufim of Atzilut, and the worlds of Briah, Yetzirah, and Assiyah. But other levels of BaN that weren’t attached to MaH remained behind in Atzilut, Briah, Yetzirah, and Assiyah, so creation wasn’t complete given there were still a number of deficiencies. Nonetheless this connection of MaH and Ban will eventually be rectified step by step to the point where everything will be repaired and in a state of perfection (Petach 61).

We’ll then touch upon the differences between MaH and BaN and their interplay, concerning which we’re told that all things concerning damage, i.e. everything that allows for defects and their ensuing punishments, are rooted in the Sephirot of BaN, whereas all things concerning repair, that come to repair these defects, are rooted in the Sephirot of MaH. But each level needs to be comprised of both MaH and Ban for the sake of the sort of governance needed. As a consequence, all aspects of rah exist there under the auspices of BaN within it, while all aspects of good exist there under the auspices of MaH (Petach 62).

And that analysis will continue with the statement that since Divine governance is based on the mystical principle of a combination of Chessed and Din, which serve as a source of right and of wrong, it follows then that two progenitors are needed for every action. Thus, a light that’s to govern will only emerge through the agency of two lights that draw it forth, i.e., that will produce it. Of these two producing lights, one will be male and from the side of MaH, and one will be female and from the side of BaN. They will then produce the light that needs to be produced by their conjunction, which will thus be constructed out of both MaH and BaN (Petach 63).

More on the Tikkun process with the statement that out of all of the Sephirot in BaN that were broken and that descended down to Briah in the Shevira process, those parts that were to be clarified were indeed clarified, and they, i.e., their vessels, ascended to receive their lights that remained in Atzilut by means of Nukveh, which elevated them that way. Alternatively, all the levels of MaH, both the vessels and lights that joined with them descended by means of the male, i.e., the Yesod of Adam Kadmon, that drew them downward this way and placed them in Nukveh. Nevertheless, the male also took part in the repair of the vessels that ascended through the female: the male repaired the right side, while the female repaired their left side. The parts then joined together in Nukveh, and MaH joined with every one of them, as a result of which the resulting offspring was complete (Petach 64).

The above-cited polarity of Male-Female is expanded upon with remarks that the themes of male and female, i.e., the theme of the conjunction of male and female, are also found in higher realms than this, namely in the world of Adam Kadmon, since the system of governance had already been set in the mystical sphere of Chessed and Din which are themselves male and female respectively. It’s just that there was a difference when it came to Nikkudim, in that male and female weren’t rectified at first in that instance, since BaN which is female emerged on its own. Only afterwards when MaH which is male came to play a part in them, i.e., in the Sephirot of Nikkudim, through the rectification process did the sources of male and female from Atzilut and downwards depend upon a “balance” of male and female, which is the mystical conjunction of MaH with BaN (Petach 65).

And the implications of the Male-Female polarity are enunciated in the idea that rectification comes about through the interactions of male and female under the rubric of the mystical notions of “coupling”, “pregnancy” and “birth”. “Coupling” comes about when the subdivisions of MaH and BaN are drawn downward so as to set everything in the female. Everything that needs to exist in the light in question in total is contained there, and there’d be no need to add or subtract anything. This totality must then to be subdivided into its various parts, but it, i.e., the “offspring”, isn’t made manifest until all of its parts are fully manifested. So, until that time, it, i.e., the Partzuf as “offspring”, is concealed within the light it depends on in order to be completed by it. This is because the lights of the one¸ i.e., of the “offspring” can only be completed through the lights of the other, i.e., of the female from which it was formed. Once it, i.e., the Partzuf, reaches the stage where all its details are manifest, even though each contains only the barest amount of illumination, the “offspring” is then made manifest, since there’s no longer a need to differentiate the light any further, and it can only gain further ability and illumination during the “suckling” process. And “birth” occurs when it, i.e., the Partzuf, is made manifest from the higher light outward (Petach 66).

We then focus upon the ascendancy implied by a Tikkun with the insight that It was the “folding” of Erich Anpin’s “legs”, i.e., of its Netzach, Hod, and Yesod, that was the first impetus for the broken vessels to ascend from Briah, Yetzirah, and Assiyah to Atzilut, and thanks to which all their subsequent ascents could come about. In truth, these vessels depended on those “legs” and they were initially sustained by them below, i.e., in Briah, Yetzirah, and Assiyah. But when the “legs” were then “folded” the vessels then had the ability to return upward. It’s in this sense that Erich Anpin is the source of everything, and they, i.e., the “legs”, that were the part of Erich Anpin could serve as the source of the vessels when they descended. But afterwards, as a result of the “folding of the legs”, Chessed, Gevurah, and Tipheret of Erich Anpin also served as their source when the rectification got greater (Petach 67).

Discussion of an ascent is expanded upon with the remark that the parts of the vessels that ascend upward from Beria, Yetzirah, and Assiyah, their orders of ascent, and their ways of interconnecting within each and every Partzuf are exactly what’s needed to make this world the way it needs to be made in the course of the Tikkun process — with just the right number of reparations, of deficiencies, and of processes necessary to complete the cycle of Divine governance and to lead to the revelation of God’s Yichud (Petach 68).

And we conclude the subject with the statement that the Tikkun is structured like a balance-scale in which all the lights are repaired in correspondence with the others, with just enough “openness” when it comes to the Tikkun of MaH, and just enough “closure” when it comes to the Tikkun of BaN, so that all produces a rectified form of Divine governance with all the great orders in place that will enable it all to bring about one cycle of creation in the course of which everything will achieve a state of goodness and utter perfection (Petach 69).

We’ll delve into all of this after an initial discussion of the idea of Tikkun in the tradition.

(c) 2013 Rabbi Yaakov Feldman

Feel free to contact me at feldman@torah.org

———————————————————-

AT LONG LAST! Rabbi Feldman’s translation of Maimonides’ “Eight Chapters” is available here at a discount.

You can still purchase a copy of Rabbi Feldman’s translation of “The Gates of Repentance” here at a discount as well.

Rabbi Yaakov Feldman has also translated and commented upon “The Path of the Just” and “The Duties of the Heart” (Jason Aronson Publishers).

Rabbi Feldman also offers two free e-mail classes on www.torah.org entitled “Spiritual Excellence” and “Ramchal”.